|
Display Printer
Friendly Version
Jehovah’s Witnesses and Christ’s Resurrection (Part Two)
In the last edition
of The Sounding Board I briefly
outlined the Christian position of the bodily resurrection of Jesus (He was
raised in the same body that died on the cross) and began to answer
Jehovah’s Witnesses’ (JWs) counter-arguments, beginning with 1 Corinthians
15:50. In this issue I continue to answer counter-arguments.
JWs Counter-Arguments Answered
1 Peter 3:18. This
verse reads that Jesus was “put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the
spirit.” The JWs translation (New World Translation,
a perverted translation that robs Christ of His deity) and the New
American Standard Bible (a legitimate
translation) read virtually the same here. The JWs argue from this verse
that Jesus’ body was put to death (and then forever disposed of by Jehovah)
but then His spirit was resurrected (“made alive in the spirit,” i.e., His
spirit only was raised). I shall focus on answering this latter point.
There are two ways
to answer this misinterpretation by JWs. First is simply to call attention
to the New International Version.
This respected translation states that Jesus was “made alive by the Spirit,”
meaning that Jesus was resurrected by
the Holy Spirit. Second is to
interpret the phrases “in the flesh” and “in the spirit” as referring to the
spheres or realms in which Jesus was put to death and made alive. He was put
to death in the realm of the flesh
(that is, the fleshly realm, where soldiers nailed him to the cross). But He
was made alive in the spiritual realm. It is here that verses 19-20 follow
nicely, “In which [i.e., in the
spiritual realm to which Peter just referred] He went and proclaimed to the
spirits in prison, who once were disobedient . . . in the days of Noah.” So
the flow here is that Jesus was put to death in the fleshly realm, but made
alive to go into the spiritual realm were disobedient spirits existed.
Next I examine three
passages wherein JWs make the claim, “They did not recognize Jesus.”
Luke 24:16. JWs
assert that the two persons on the Emmaus road “did not recognize Him.” A
closer reading of the verse, however, reveals that the two “were kept from
recognizing him” (New World Translation).
There is quite a difference here. JWs claim that the two did not recognize
Jesus because he had another body made to look like the one with which He
walked the earth. The fact is, though, that Jesus appeared to them in the
same body (see John 2:19-21, cf. Luke
24:36-39), and that they were kept
from recognizing Him. |
|
John 20:14.
Mary Magdalene “did not discern it was Jesus” (New World Translation),
say JWs. But upon closer examination
of the context, there is an answer to their argument. Beginning with verse 1
we find a number of phenomena that distracted Mary from discerning that it
was Jesus who appeared to her. She came to the tomb, only to find the stone
removed from the opening of the tomb. She therefore thought someone had
taken away the Lord’s body (v. 2). Further, just before Jesus’ appearance to
her she was weeping (v. 11) and saw two angels (v. 12). Once Jesus appeared,
Mary had her back to Him (v. 14) and then turned, but did not discern it was
the Lord. She then turned her back to Jesus again (implied in v. 16) but
then turned toward Him a second time after He called her name. She then
discerned it was Jesus.
The main point I
wish to make is that the fault lies with Mary that she did not discern it
was Jesus, not that Jesus had a different body. Mary was preoccupied with
the several phenomena previously noted, and therefore did not recognize Him
at first. Let’s suppose you are window shopping at the local mall. With most
of your attention given to various items in the windows of stores, you
happen to look at your best friend 20-30 feet away. You quickly turn back to
your window gazing, not discerning that it was your friend. Then moments
later your friend approaches you and you apologize, saying, “Sorry, I looked
directly at you but did not recognize you. I was so into these displays.”
Certainly your friend did not possess another body. The fault, rather, was
yours due to your preoccupation.
John 21:4. The
New World Translation of the JWs
reads, “Jesus stood on the beach, but the disciples did not, of course,
discern that it was Jesus.” Again the assumption of JWs is that Jesus had
another body, not His original body, for that body was forever gone. This is
the reason the disciples did not discern it was Jesus. But, again, a closer
look at the context reveals the JWs misinterpretation. First, it was just
becoming morning (v. 4), so we assume here that the brightest part of the
day had not yet occurred. Second, in verse 8 we read that the disciples were
300 feet away in a boat!
Conclusion
Though at first
glance JWs arguments for their denial of the bodily resurrection of Christ
might seem powerful, upon examination of the contexts of biblical passages
cited by them we find that they have misinterpreted these passages. A
knowledge of the correct understanding of these texts by Christians can lead
to a very powerful witnessing opportunity with JWs. May the Lord give us His
grace and the power of the Holy Spirit to engage them fruitfully when they
come knocking at our doors.
Steven Tsoukalas |